Infliximab monitoring during remission limits IBD flare-ups

Trough infliximab concentrations were measured in patients who were in clinical remission at about 1 year on maintenance therapy. When trough concentrations fell below 5 mcg/mL, patients got a dose increase. The goal was to prevent secondary loss of response due to recurrence of symptoms or antibody-mediated side effects, such as infusion reactions, Dr. Byron P. Vaughn explained at the annual Digestive Disease Week. In a retrospective, nonrandomized proof-of-concept study, 48 inflammatory bowel disease patients in remission on infliximab were proactively monitored, and 78 matched controls were conventionally managed. The infliximab discontinuation rate during up to 5 years of follow-up was 10% in the proactively monitored group and 31% in the controls. Nearly 90% of treatment discontinuations in the control group were caused by loss of response or development of acute infusion reactions; in contrast, no one in the proactively monitored group stopped infliximab for those reasons. “We think this is exciting information. We now recommend dose optimization to a trough level of at least 3 mcg/mL, and our current clinical practice is to target a range of 5-10 mcg/mL,” said Dr. Vaughn, of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard University, Boston. Of course, the findings certainly need to be validated in a prospective study, he added. For about the first year of infliximab therapy, the treatment continuation curves were similar for the two groups. After 1 year, the curves separated and the benefit of proactive trough monitoring could be seen. The main reasons for stopping infliximab in the control group were a flare of symptoms (15 patients) and acute infusion reactions (6 patients). Neither of these events occurred in the proactively monitored patients. The reasons for treatment discontinuation in the proactively monitored group included drug-induced lupus (1 patient), psoriasis (1 patient), a delayed infusion reaction (1 patient), and a reason unrelated to the medication (1 patient). Three-quarters of study participants had Crohn’s disease, and the rest had ulcerative colitis. Other investigators have previously shown that an undetectable serum infliximab trough concentration in the setting of Crohn’s disease often heralds a loss of response. Dr. Vaughn emphasized that fully one in four patients had an undetectable trough level at the first measurement, and nearly two-thirds had levels below 5 mcg/mL. The infliximab dose was increased in those patients. Patients with a trough level of 5-10 mcg/mL received no change in their regimen, while those with a level of more than 10 mcg/mL on two occasions got either a dose reduction or an increase in the interval between doses if they were on 5 mg/kg. In gastroenterology, serum infliximab concentrations are typically measured when patients stop responding or have side effects. So the costs of proactive infliximab monitoring and dose escalation are going to be an impediment to widespread implementation of this strategy under many health plans, at least until there is confirmatory data, he said. Proactive trough concentration monitoring and dose titration are typical in recipients of solid organ transplants receiving cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) inhibitors, and are often performed in sepsis patients receiving vancomycin and gentamicin. When asked how often he recommends proactive infliximab trough testing, Dr. Vaughn replied, “I think when people are in a steady state – they’re not ill and they’re not flaring – you could probably check once every 6 months or maybe once a year. After a few stable troughs, that could be enough unless there’s been a major change like a big weight change, a change in other medications, or an illness.”